Does it make a difference if a company represents that a loan is non-recourse and later the market discovers that company is liable for repayment of the loan? Absolutely. Just ask the investors in Technical Olympic USA, Inc. (NYSE: TOA), a Florida-based builder of single-family residences, town homes, and condominiums.
It is alleged that Technical Olympic represented that it had completed the acquisition of the homebuilding assets and operations of Transeastern Properties, Inc. and the joint venture was funded with non-recourse debt.
However, on November 6, 2006, the Company disclosed in a SEC filing that the Company faced exposure for the full repayment of the loans of the Transeastern Joint Venture in the event the Joint Venture voluntarily filed for bankruptcy protection. More bad news would follow. On November 7, 2006, the Company disclosed that one of the lenders to the joint venture had made a demand on the Company in connection with the debt of the joint venture. Not surprising, Technical Olympic stock dropped both days as the true facts about the Company was revealed.